4.6 Article

Estimating the extrinsic incubation period of malaria using a mechanistic model of sporogony

Journal

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008658

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/P012345/1]
  2. MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis - UK Medical Research Council (MRC) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement [MR/R015600/1]
  3. MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis - UK Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement [MR/R015600/1]
  4. European Union
  5. NERC [2131872] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extrinsic incubation period (EIP) of malaria-causing parasites in mosquitoes is crucial for malaria transmission, but estimating it is challenging due to large variability in development times and parasite numbers. Introducing a mathematical model of parasite population dynamics in mosquitoes helps improve understanding of transmission heterogeneity.
Author summary Anopheles mosquitoes become infected with malaria-causing parasites when blood feeding on an infectious host. The parasites then reproduce via a number of life stages, which begin in the mosquito gut and end in the salivary glands, where the newly formed infectious parasites can be transmitted to another host the next time a mosquito blood feeds. This delay in the mosquito becoming infectious, known as the extrinsic incubation period (EIP), is long relative to mosquito life expectancy. Consequently, the EIP is important in determining whether a mosquito is able to transmit malaria. The EIP is typically estimated by fitting a statistical model to parasite data from the dissection of numerous mosquitoes. The large variability in development times and parasite numbers that exists between parasites, mosquitoes and environments means that estimating the EIP is difficult. Here, we introduce a mathematical model of the population dynamics of the mosquito life stages of the parasite, which mimics key characteristics of the biology. We show that the model's parameters can be fit so that its predictions correspond with experimental observations. Our work is a step towards a realistic model of within-mosquito parasite dynamics, which can be applied to help understand heterogeneity in malaria transmission. During sporogony, malaria-causing parasites infect a mosquito, reproduce and migrate to the mosquito salivary glands where they can be transmitted the next time blood feeding occurs. The time required for sporogony, known as the extrinsic incubation period (EIP), is an important determinant of malaria transmission intensity. The EIP is typically estimated as the time for a given percentile, x, of infected mosquitoes to develop salivary gland sporozoites (the infectious parasite life stage), which is denoted by EIPx. Many mechanisms, however, affect the observed sporozoite prevalence including the human-to-mosquito transmission probability and possibly differences in mosquito mortality according to infection status. To account for these various mechanisms, we present a mechanistic mathematical model, which explicitly models key processes at the parasite, mosquito and observational scales. Fitting this model to experimental data, we find greater variation in the EIP than previously thought: we estimated the range between EIP10 and EIP90 (at 27 degrees C) as 4.5 days compared to 0.9 days using existing statistical methods. This pattern holds over the range of study temperatures included in the dataset. Increasing temperature from 21 degrees C to 34 degrees C decreased the EIP50 from 16.1 to 8.8 days. Our work highlights the importance of mechanistic modelling of sporogony to (1) improve estimates of malaria transmission under different environmental conditions or disease control programs and (2) evaluate novel interventions that target the mosquito life stages of the parasite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available