4.6 Article

What is the financial burden to patients of accessing surgical care in Sierra Leone? A cross-sectional survey of catastrophic and impoverishing expenditure

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039049

Keywords

surgery; health economics; health policy

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Unit on Health System Strengthening in Sub--Saharan Africa, King's College London using UK aid from the UK Government [GHRU 16/136/54]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study in Sierra Leone found that 18% of patients undergoing surgical care experience catastrophic expenditure, with 45% already living below the national poverty line before admission. 9% of patients were pushed below the poverty line following payment for surgical care. 84% of patients used household savings to meet out-of-pocket costs, while only 2% had health insurance.
Objectives To measure the financial burden associated with accessing surgical care in Sierra Leone. Design A cross-sectional survey conducted with patients at the time of discharge from tertiary-level care. This captured demographics, yearly household expenditure, direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs for surgical care, and summary household assets. Missing data were imputed. Setting The main tertiary-level hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Participants 335 surgical patients under the care of the hospital surgical team receiving operative or non-operative surgical care on the surgical wards. Outcome measures Rates of catastrophic expenditure (a cost >10% of annual expenditure), impoverishment (being pushed into, or further into, poverty as a result of surgical care costs), amount of out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and means used to meet these costs were derived. Results Of 335 patients interviewed, 39% were female and 80% were urban dwellers. Median yearly household expenditure was US$3569. Mean OOP costs were US$243, of which a mean of US$24 (10%) was spent prehospital. Of costs incurred during the hospital admission, direct medical costs were US$138 (63%) and US$34 (16%) were direct non-medical costs. US$46 (21%) were indirect costs. Catastrophic expenditure affected 18% of those interviewed. Concerning impoverishment, 45% of patients were already below the national poverty line prior to admission, and 9% of those who were not were pushed below the poverty line following payment for surgical care. 84% of patients used household savings to meet OOP costs. Only 2% (six patients) had health insurance. Conclusion Obtaining surgical care has substantial economic impacts on households that pushes them into poverty or further into poverty. The much-needed scaling up of surgical care needs to be accompanied by financial risk protection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available