4.4 Article

Women's multiple uses of an overdose prevention technology to mitigate risks and harms within a supportive housing environment: a qualitative study

Journal

BMC WOMENS HEALTH
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01196-6

Keywords

Opioid overdose; Housing; Women; Sex work; Violence; Mobile technologies

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health (CIHR) [PJT-162290, PJT-155943]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01DA044181]
  3. CIHR
  4. Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarships from CIHR
  5. CIHR New Investigator Award
  6. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award (MSFHR)
  7. NIH
  8. MSFHR/St. Paul's Foundation/BCCSU Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that participants not only used the overdose response button technology to deal with drug overdoses, but also unexpectedly adopted other methods, such as response to emergency situations like gender-based violence. This highlights the limitations of current technology and the clear need for housing-based emergency response interventions that address not only drug overdose risks, but also gender-based violence.
BackgroundNorth America is amidst an opioid overdose epidemic. In many settings, particularly Canada, the majority of overdose deaths occur indoors and impact structurally vulnerable people who use drugs alone, making targeted housing-based interventions a priority. Mobile applications have been developed that allow individuals to solicit help to prevent overdose death. We examine the experiences of women residents utilizing an overdose response button technology within a supportive housing environment.MethodsIn October 2019, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 14 residents of a women-only supportive housing building in an urban setting where the overdose response button technology was installed. Data was analyzed thematically and framed by theories of structural vulnerability.ResultsWhile participants described the utility and disadvantages of the technology for overdose response, most participants, unexpectedly described alternate adoptions of the technology. Participants used the technology for other emergency situations (e.g., gender-based violence), rather than its intended purpose of overdose response.ConclusionsOur findings highlight the limitations of current technologies while also demonstrating the clear need for housing-based emergency response interventions that address not just overdose risk but also gender-based violence. These need to be implemented alongside larger strategies to address structural vulnerabilities and provide greater agency to marginalized women who use drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available