4.5 Article

Prognostic value of the preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio for survival after lung cancer surgery

Journal

BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01446-1

Keywords

Inflammation; Lung cancer; Survival; Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients with surgically-resected early stage lung cancer.
Background The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with lung cancer treated with radical surgery. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with lung cancer who prospectively underwent radical resection between 2004 and 2012. Blood samples were taken as part of the preoperative workup. The inflammatory markers studied were absolute values of lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and platelets, with subsequent calculation of ratios. Median follow-up was 52 months. Results Two hundred and sixty-eight patients underwent surgery, of whom 218 (81.3%) were men. Mean age was 62.9 +/- 8.7 years. A lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio >= 2.5 was independently associated with longer disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.476 (0.307-0.738), p = 0.001) and longer overall survival (HR, 0.546; 95% CI: 0.352-0.846; p = 0.007), in models adjusted for age, sex, stage, and type of resection. No other systemic inflammatory marker showed a significant association. Conclusion Preoperative LMR is an independent prognostic factor of overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients with surgically-resected early stage lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available