4.7 Article

A novel approach to the classification of terrestrial drainage networks based on deep learning and preliminary results on solar system bodies

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85254-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. INAF PRIN-SKA 2017 program [1.05.01.88.04]
  2. University of Naples Federico II (Italy)
  3. Foreign Universities or Research Institutes for Short Time Mobility of Teachers, Scholars, and Researchers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposed a data-driven deep learning approach to investigate the geomorphological features of drainage networks, which achieved successful results and demonstrated the potential of deep learning in geomorphology and related fields.
Several approaches were proposed to describe the geomorphology of drainage networks and the abiotic/biotic factors determining their morphology. There is an intrinsic complexity of the explicit qualification of the morphological variations in response to various types of control factors and the difficulty of expressing the cause-effect links. Traditional methods of drainage network classification are based on the manual extraction of key characteristics, then applied as pattern recognition schemes. These approaches, however, have low predictive and uniform ability. We present a different approach, based on the data-driven supervised learning by images, extended also to extraterrestrial cases. With deep learning models, the extraction and classification phase is integrated within a more objective, analytical, and automatic framework. Despite the initial difficulties, due to the small number of training images available, and the similarity between the different shapes of the drainage samples, we obtained successful results, concluding that deep learning is a valid way for data exploration in geomorphology and related fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available