4.7 Article

Optimized anti-reflection core-shell microspheres for enhanced optical trapping by structured light beams

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84665-0

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the optical trapping of anti-reflection core-shell microspheres using different structured beams, showing a significant enhancement in trap strength. The optimal core-shell thickness ratio for different materials is obtained, resulting in improved trapping effectiveness.
In this paper, we study the optical trapping of anti-reflection core-shell microspheres by regular Gaussian beam and several structured beams including radially polarized Gaussian, petal, and hard-aperture-truncated circular Airy beams. We show that using an appropriate anti-reflection core-shell microsphere for the optical trapping by several structured light beams can dramatically enhance the strength of the trap compared to the trapping by the common Gaussian beam. The optimal core-shell thickness ratio that minimizes the scattering force is obtained for polystyrene-silica and anatase-amorphous titania microspheres, such that the core-shells act as anti-reflection coated microspheres. We show that the trapping strength of the anti-reflection coated microparticles trapped by the common Gaussian beam is enhanced up to 2-fold compared to that of trapped uncoated microparticles, while the trapping of anti-reflection coated microparticles, by the radially polarized beam, is strengthened up to 4-fold in comparison to that of the trapped uncoated microparticles by the Gaussian beam. Our results indicate that for anatase-amorphous titania microparticles highest trap strength is obtained by radially polarized beam, while for the polystyrene-silica microparticles, the strongest trapping is achieved by the petal beam.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available