4.7 Article

Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST103-2320-B038-005-MY3]
  2. Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University [105swf08]
  3. China Medical University Hospital [CMUH-DMR-108-056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of AIF selection on vertebral perfusion quantification using DCE-MRI. Simulation results showed that decreasing peak in AIF increased K-trans and v(e), while increasing delay time in AIF increased v(p). In human subjects, K-trans and v(e) were significantly smaller with AIF_A compared to AIF_SA, while both parameters were significantly greater with AIF_SA compared to AIF_A.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of arterial input function (AIF) selection on the quantification of vertebral perfusion using axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). In this study, axial DCE-MRI was performed on 2 vertebrae in each of eight healthy volunteers (mean age, 36.9 years; 5 men) using a 1.5-T scanner. The pharmacokinetic parameters K-trans, v(e), and v(p), derived using a Tofts model on axial DCE-MRI of the lumbar vertebrae, were evaluated using various AIFs: the population-based aortic AIF (AIF_PA), a patient-specific aortic AIF (AIF_A) and a patient-specific segmental arterial AIF (AIF_SA). Additionally, peaks and delay times were changed to simulate the effects of various AIFs on the calculation of perfusion parameters. Nonparametric analyses including the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Kruskal-Wallis test with a Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis were performed. In simulation, K-trans and v(e) increased as the peak in the AIF decreased, but v(p) increased when delay time in the AIF increased. In humans, the estimated K-trans and v(e) were significantly smaller using AIF_A compared to AIF_SA no matter the computation style (pixel-wise or region-of-interest based). Both these perfusion parameters were significantly greater using AIF_SA compared to AIF_A.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available