4.7 Article

Retrieving the structure of probabilistic sequences of auditory stimuli from EEG data

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83119-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FAPESP project Research, Innovation and Dissemination Center for Neuromathematics [2013/07699-0]
  2. Financiadora de Estudos e projetos FINEP (PROINFRA HOSPITALAR Grant) [18.569-8]
  3. CNPq fellowships [311 719/2016-3, 309560/2017-9]
  4. FAPERJ fellowship [CNE 202.785/2018]
  5. CNPq
  6. FAPESP [201696/2015-0, 2016/17791-9, 201572/2015-0, 2016/17789-4, 2016/22053-7]
  7. project Plasticity in the brain after a brachial plexus lesion (FAPERJ Grants) [E26/010002902/2014, E26/010002474/2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used a new probabilistic approach to model the relationship between sequences of auditory stimuli and EEG data, finding that the context tree generating the stimuli can be effectively extracted from the EEG data, thus providing support for the classical conjecture that the brain assigns probabilistic models to samples of stimuli.
Using a new probabilistic approach we model the relationship between sequences of auditory stimuli generated by stochastic chains and the electroencephalographic (EEG) data acquired while 19 participants were exposed to those stimuli. The structure of the chains generating the stimuli are characterized by rooted and labeled trees whose leaves, henceforth called contexts, represent the sequences of past stimuli governing the choice of the next stimulus. A classical conjecture claims that the brain assigns probabilistic models to samples of stimuli. If this is true, then the context tree generating the sequence of stimuli should be encoded in the brain activity. Using an innovative statistical procedure we show that this context tree can effectively be extracted from the EEG data, thus giving support to the classical conjecture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available