4.7 Article

Designing a bed-side system for predicting length of stay in a neonatal intensive care unit

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82957-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Child Health Imprints (CHIL) Pte. Ltd., Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased length of stay in intensive care units is associated with patient gestation age, nutrition deviation, and clinical diagnoses. Unique risk factors were identified for each gestation age group, with deviations from recommended nutrition and medication guidelines significantly impacting predicted length of stay.
Increased length of stay (LOS) in intensive care units is directly associated with the financial burden, anxiety, and increased mortality risks. In the current study, we have incorporated the association of day-to-day nutrition and medication data of the patient during its stay in hospital with its predicted LOS. To demonstrate the same, we developed a model to predict the LOS using risk factors (a) perinatal and antenatal details, (b) deviation of nutrition and medication dosage from guidelines, and (c) clinical diagnoses encountered during NICU stay. Data of 836 patient records (12 months) from two NICU sites were used and validated on 211 patient records (4 months). A bedside user interface integrated with EMR has been designed to display the model performance results on the validation dataset. The study shows that each gestation age group of patients has unique and independent risk factors associated with the LOS. The gestation is a significant risk factor for neonates <34 weeks, nutrition deviation for <32 weeks, and clinical diagnosis (sepsis) for >= 32 weeks. Patients on medications had considerable extra LOS for >= 32 weeks' gestation. The presented LOS model is tailored for each patient, and deviations from the recommended nutrition and medication guidelines were significantly associated with the predicted LOS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available