4.7 Article

Bladder and bowel responses to lumbosacral epidural stimulation in uninjured and transected anesthetized rats

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81822-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Roadmap Initiative, Office of Strategic Coordination-The Common Fund, Other Transactions, Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions (SPARC) Program Award [OT2OD024898]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) was used to identify parameters for bladder and bowel activity in rats, showing frequency-dependent effects with differences based on neurological intactness and sex. A custom-designed electrode array exhibited similar urinary effects over a smaller surface area.
Spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) mapping at L5-S1 was performed to identify parameters for bladder and bowel inhibition and/or contraction. Using spinally intact and chronic transected rats of both sexes in acute urethane-anesthetized terminal preparations, scES was systematically applied using a modified Specify 5-6-5 (Medtronic) electrode during bladder filling/emptying cycles while recording bladder and colorectal pressures and external urethral and anal sphincter electromyography activity. The results indicate frequency-dependent effects on void volume, micturition, bowel peristalsis, and sphincter activity just above visualized movement threshold intensities that differed depending upon neurological intactness, with some sex-dependent differences. Thereafter, a custom-designed miniature 15-electrode array designed for greater selectivity was tested and exhibited the same frequency-dependent urinary effects over a much smaller surface area without any concurrent movements. Thus, select activation of autonomic nervous system circuitries with scES is a promising neuromodulation approach for expedient translation to individuals with SCI and potentially other neurologic disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available