4.7 Article

Reciprocal change of occipitocervical parameters after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85189-3

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that ACDF can increase the recovery of cervical lordosis postoperatively, leading to reciprocal changes in occipitocervical parameters.
To evaluate the reciprocal changes in occipitocervical parameters according to the recovery of cervical lordosis (CL) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with sagittal imbalance. Sixty-five cases that underwent ACDF were followed. They were divided according to the recovery of the CL: Group 1 (Delta CL > 5 degrees, 30 cases) and Group 2 (Delta CL < 5 degrees, 35 cases). The following parameters were measured: occiput-cervical inclination (OCI), CL, occiput-C2 angle (OC2A), distance between external occipital protuberance and spinous process of C2 (OC2D), distance between spinous processes of C2 and C7 (C27D), and shortest distance between the plumb line of C2 body and posterosuperior corner of C7 (C27SVA). Overall, all parameters changed significantly after ACDF. Preoperative CL and preoperative C27D showed a correlation with Delta CL. Delta CL was negatively correlated with Delta C27D and Delta C27SVA. In Group 1, CL increased from - 2.60 +/- 1.88 degrees to 11.57 +/- 1.83 degrees, OC2A decreased from 23.96 +/- 2.05 degrees to 19.87 +/- 1.36 degrees, OC2D increased from 82.96 +/- 1.48 mm to 86.50 +/- 1.81 mm, C27D decreased from 95.61 +/- 2.66 mm to 87.01 +/- 2.50 mm, and C27SVA decreased from 24.14 +/- 2.20 mm to 17.06 +/- 2.14 mm. In Group 2, only OCI decreased significantly after ACDF. ACDF can increase CL postoperatively in patients with cervical sagittal imbalance. Patients with significant CL recovery after ACDF showed a reciprocal change in occipitocervical parameters. (OC2A, OC2D).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available