4.7 Article

Biomolecular phenotyping and heterogeneity assessment of mesenchymal stromal cells using label-free Raman spectroscopy

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81991-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CNPq
  2. Science Without Borders
  3. University of York
  4. Wellcome Trust through the Centre for Chronic Diseases and Disorders (C2D2) at the University of York [097829]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the use of Raman spectroscopy for classifying and stratifying bone-derived mesenchymal stromal cells based on biological function, with quantified assessment of biomolecular stratification and cell heterogeneity achieved through high-precision measurements and statistical sampling. The results show the potential of these methods as label-free assays for cell sub-type classification within complex heterogeneous populations, with implications for therapeutic translation and phenotypic characterisation of various cells.
Easy, quantitative measures of biomolecular heterogeneity and high-stratified phenotyping are needed to identify and characterise complex disease processes at the single-cell level, as well as to predict cell fate. Here, we demonstrate how Raman spectroscopy can be used in the difficult-to-assess case of clonal, bone-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) to identify MSC lines and group these according to biological function (e.g., differentiation capacity). Biomolecular stratification is achieved using high-precision measures obtained from representative statistical sampling that also enable quantified heterogeneity assessment. Application to primary MSCs and human dermal fibroblasts shows use of these measures as a label-free assay to classify cell sub-types within complex heterogeneous cell populations, thus demonstrating the potential for therapeutic translation, and broad application to the phenotypic characterisation of other cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available