Journal
PHYTOTAXA
Volume 487, Issue 3, Pages 263-272Publisher
MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.487.3.6
Keywords
taxonomy; Compositae; China
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [31970209, 3162010390]
- Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The authors conducted a critical examination of plant type materials and field observations, and found that Cirsium forrestii, C. melanoplepis, and C. taliense are not conspecific with C. henryi. Among them, C. forrestii and C. taliense should be considered as independent species, while C. melanoplepis is actually conspecific with C. forrestii.
Cirsium forrestii, C. melanoplepis and C. taliense have been usually treated as synonyms of C. henryi. Our critical examination of type materials and field observation reveals that all the three taxa are actually not conspecific with C. henryi. Cirsium forrestii and C. taliense should be both reinstated as independent species, whileas C. melanoplepis is in fact conspecific with C. forrestii. Cirsium taliense is found conspecific with C. chlorolepis, and C. chlorolepis is newly treated as a synonym for C. taliense. We modified the description of C. henryi, which in fact only occurs in Hubei province of China. Lectotypification is proposed for C. henryi and C. taliense.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available