4.7 Article

The Relationship between Food Security Status and Fruit and Vegetable Intake during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13030712

Keywords

COVID-19; food insecurity; fruit; vegetable

Funding

  1. Wayne State University faculty research start-up funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed food shopping behaviors and led to increased food insecurity due to economic recession. Food-insecure individuals consume fewer fruits and vegetables, facing negative health impacts related to poor diet during the pandemic.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has drastically altered food shopping behaviors, and the resulting economic recession has caused a spike in food insecurity. Since food insecurity is associated with poor diet, especially low intake of fruits and vegetables, food-insecure individuals may disproportionately experience negative health impacts related to poor diet during the pandemic. To assess the relationship between food security status and fruit and vegetable intake during the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted an online survey of adult residents of the US state of Michigan in June of 2020. Among the 484 survey respondents, 36.2% were classified as food-insecure. Food-insecure respondents consumed fruits and vegetables fewer times per day than food-secure respondents and were more likely to report decreasing their consumption of any type of fruits and vegetables (total, fresh, frozen, and canned) since the pandemic started. For those who reduced their purchase of fresh fruit and vegetable, reasons included poor quality, poor availability, high price, reduced store trips, and concerns of contamination. These findings highlight the need for adequate food assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic and in future pandemics, as well as public health messages that promote healthy eating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available