4.7 Article

Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Focused on Normalization of Glycemia: A Two-Year Pilot Study

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13030749

Keywords

prediabetes; remote continuous care; low carbohydrate; metabolic syndrome; obesity

Funding

  1. Virta Health Corp

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess an alternative approach to type 2 diabetes prevention through a two-year carbohydrate restricted nutrition therapy intervention for 96 prediabetes patients. Results showed the potential utility of this alternate approach in normalizing blood sugar and improving related comorbidities.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of an alternative approach to type 2 diabetes prevention. Ninety-six patients with prediabetes (age 52 (10) years; 80% female; BMI 39.2 (7.1) kg/m(2)) received a continuous remote care intervention focused on reducing hyperglycemia through carbohydrate restricted nutrition therapy for two years in a single arm, prospective, longitudinal pilot study. Two-year retention was 75% (72 of 96 participants). Fifty-one percent of participants (49 of 96) met carbohydrate restriction goals as assessed by blood beta-hydroxybutyrate concentrations for more than one-third of reported measurements. Estimated cumulative incidence of normoglycemia (HbA1c < 5.7% without medication) and type 2 diabetes (HbA1c >= 6.5% or <6.5% with medication other than metformin) at two years were 52.3% and 3%, respectively. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome, class II or greater obesity, and suspected hepatic steatosis significantly decreased at two years. These results demonstrate the potential utility of an alternate approach to type 2 diabetes prevention, carbohydrate restricted nutrition therapy delivered through a continuous remote care model, for normalization of glycemia and improvement in related comorbidities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available