4.6 Article

Sustainable Production of Arecanut Husk Ash as Potential Silica Replacement for Synthesis of Silicate-Based Glass-Ceramics Materials

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14051141

Keywords

arecanut ash; ZnO; SiO2; zinc silicate; optical; structural; willemite

Funding

  1. Malaysian Ministry of Education (MOE) [9642800]
  2. Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) [9642800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates the potential of using arecanut husk as a replacement for silica in the synthesis of zinc silicate, resulting in a cleaner and more environmentally friendly production of materials. The zinc silicate produced showed promise as phosphors materials after sintering, with increased grain sizes observed.
Arecanut husk (AH) was selected as a material for silica replacement in the synthesis process of glass-ceramics zinc silicate and also the fact that it has no traditional use and often being dumped and results in environmental issues. The process of pyrolysis was carried out at temperature 700 degrees C and above based on thermogravimetric analysis to produce arecanut husk ash (AHA). The average purity of the silica content in AHA ranged from 29.17% to 45.43%. Furthermore, zinc oxide was introduced to AHA and zinc silicate started to form at sintering temperature 700 degrees C and showed increased diffraction intensity upon higher sintering temperature of 600 degrees C to 1000 degrees C based on X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The grain sizes of the zinc silicate increased from 1011 nm to 3518 nm based on the morphological studies carried out by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). In addition, the optical band gap of the sample was measured to be in the range from 2.410 eV to 2.697 eV after sintering temperature. From the data, it is believed that a cleaner production of low-cost zinc silicate can be achieved by using arecanut husk and have the potential to be used as phosphors materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available