4.6 Article

Measurements of Density of Liquid Oxides with an Aero-Acoustic Levitator

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14040822

Keywords

levitation; rare earth oxides; zirconia; hafnia; melting; thermodynamics

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [NSF-DMR 1835848, NSF-DMR 2015852]
  2. German Research Foundation [Te146/37-2, GZ/Inst 222/779-1 FUGG AOBJ:544260]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a method for measuring the density and thermal expansion of liquid oxides at their melting points using an aero-acoustic levitator with laser heating and machine vision algorithms. Accurate density values for several liquid oxides were obtained, providing essential data for thermodynamic modeling and material manufacturing. Further improvement in accuracy can be achieved through the use of backlight illumination, spectropyrometry, and a multi-emitter acoustic levitator.
Densities of liquid oxide melts with melting temperatures above 2000 degrees C are required to establish mixing models in the liquid state for thermodynamic modeling and advanced additive manufacturing and laser welding of ceramics. Accurate measurements of molten rare earth oxide density were recently reported from experiments with an electrostatic levitator on board the International Space Station. In this work, we present an approach to terrestrial measurements of density and thermal expansion of liquid oxides from high-speed videography using an aero-acoustic levitator with laser heating and machine vision algorithms. The following density values for liquid oxides at melting temperature were obtained: Y2O3 4.6 +/- 0.15; Yb2O3 8.4 +/- 0.2; Zr0.9Y0.1O1.95 4.7 +/- 0.2; Zr0.95Y0.05O1.975 4.9 +/- 0.2; HfO2 8.2 +/- 0.3 g/cm(3). The accuracy of density and thermal expansion measurements can be improved by employing backlight illumination, spectropyrometry and a multi-emitter acoustic levitator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available