4.6 Article

Investigation of the Quasi-Static Penetration Resistance Behaviour of Carbon/Aramid Fibre-Reinforced PP Laminate

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14040709

Keywords

hybrid composites; laminates; polymer– matrix composites; quasistatic penetration test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents experimental results of quasi-static penetration tests on laminates reinforced with aramid and carbon fibers in hybrid and non-hybrid configurations. The study investigates the impact of fiber combinations and support span to punch diameter ratios on laminate properties and damage mechanisms.
This work presents the experimental results of a quasi-static attempt at the penetration of hybrid and non-hybrid laminates reinforced with aramid and carbon fibres on a thermoplastic polypropylene matrix. The hybrid laminates were prepared in two fibre combinations: carbon-aramid-carbon (CAC), in which the carbon fibres comprised the outer (lining) layers, and aramid-carbon-aramid (ACA) with carbon fibres in their intermediate layers. A quasistatic penetration attempt was performed for two coefficients: SPR-support span to punch diameter ratio, (SPR = 2 and 5). The SPR = Ds/Dp was calculated as the ratio of the support (Ds) to the punch diameter (Dp). A punch with a rounded 9-mm diameter tip was used to penetrate the material. Percentage changes of penetration energy (%E) and of maximum load (%P) compared to a non-hybrid laminate with carbon fibres were calculated in order to estimate the impact of hybridisation on the properties of laminates. The maximum load recorded during a quasi-static penetration test was used to calculate the PSS (punch shear strength) of the laminates. The damage was observed after the penetration test. It was observed that both the order of layers of laminate reinforcement as well as the SPR coefficient used in the test influenced the obtained results and the laminate damage mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available