4.6 Article

Two subpopulations of Crocosphaera watsonii have distinct distributions in the North and South Pacific

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 514-524

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.13180

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF Center for Microbial Oceanography: Research and Education [EF0424599]
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  3. NERC [noc010003] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010003] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crocosphaera watsonii is a unicellular nitrogen (N-2)-fixing cyanobacterium with ecological importance in oligotrophic oceans. In cultivated strains there are two phenotypes of C.watsonii (large and small cells) with differences that could differentially impact biogeochemical processes. Recent work has shown the phenotypes diverged through loss or addition of type-specific genes in a fraction of their genomes, whereas the rest of the genomes were maintained at 99-100% DNA identity. Previous molecular assays for C.watsonii abundances targeted the conserved regions and therefore could not differentiate between phenotypes, so their relative distributions in natural communities were unknown. To determine phenotype distributions, this study developed and applied type-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays to samples from the North and South Pacific. Abundances of both Crocosphaera types declined sharply with depth between 45 and 75m in both sites. In surface water small cells were 10-100 times more abundant than large cells in the N. Pacific, whereas in the S. Pacific the two phenotypes were nearly equal. Evidence for large cell aggregation was only found in N. Pacific samples. The differences in C.watsonii sub-populations in the North and South Pacific have direct implications for biogeochemistry and carbon export in oligotrophic gyres.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available