4.7 Review

Systematic review and meta-analysis on volume-outcome relationship of abdominal surgical procedures in Germany

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages 24-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.12.010

Keywords

Volume-outcome; Mortality; Failure to rescue; Meta-analysis; Germany

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 2 million patients in Germany shows a clear relationship between treatment volume and patient outcomes in abdominal surgical interventions, particularly for complex procedures. High volume hospitals demonstrate significantly lower mortality rates and failure to rescue for patients, highlighting the importance of volume in surgical outcomes.
Background: In the past, for a number of abdominal surgical interventions a correlation between treatment volume of a hospital and the patient's outcome was shown in national and international studies. Methods: Based on a systematic literature search we analyzed the absolute and risk-adjusted in-house lethality as well as the rate of complications and the failure to rescue after abdominal surgery in Germany. The hospitals were grouped in quintiles according to the volume of treatment. Results: 11 studies including more than 2 million patients were identified and surgeries for the treatment of 9 disease conditions were studied. The meta-analysis shows a significantly lower absolute and risk-adjusted inhouse mortality for surgery in hospitals with high treatment volumes compared to low volume hospitals. In the context of subgroup analysis, this effect is demonstrated especially for complex surgical procedures. The failure to rescue in patients suffering from sepsis is significantly lower in high volume centers compared to low volume centers. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis shows on more than 2 million patients that there is a volume-outcome relationship for the surgical treatment of abdominal diseases in Germany across various organ systems, which is particularly true for complex interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available