4.5 Article

The predictive value of serial serum estradiol and serial endometrial volume on endometrial receptivity on assisted reproductive technology cycles

Journal

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03672-1

Keywords

Endometrial receptivity; Serum estradiol; Endometrial volume; Adjusted endometrial volume; Embryo implantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A prospective case control study of 169 subjects undergoing assisted reproductive technologies found that continuous serum estradiol and 3D endometrial volume may serve as useful real time tools for predicting endometrial receptivity during ART procedures.
BackgroundDiagnosis of endometrial receptivity is still unclear and conflicting. Despite advances in embryo development during assisted reproductive technologies (ART) cycles, the intricate process of implantation is still matter for debate and research.Materials and methodsProspective case control of 169 subjects during ovarian controlled stimulation for ART. Endometrial receptivity assessment to predict clinical pregnancy with serial continuous biochemical (serum estradiol) and biophysical (endometrial volume and adjusted endometrial volume) parameters were used. Both parameters were compared between negative and positive outcome in terms of clinical pregnancy.ResultsNo statistical difference was noted between the two groups in terms of demographics and ART procedures and scores. Serum estradiol was significantly higher in the positive group from day 8 after ovarian controlled stimulation. Endometrial volume and adjusted endometrial volume were significantly higher in the positive group as soon as day 6 of ovarian controlled stimulation.ConclusionsContinuous serum estradiol and 3D endometrial volume and adjusted endometrial volumes may reflect endometrial changes during ART procedures and provide a useful real time tool for clinicians in predicting endometrial receptivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available