4.8 Review

Oxygen Evolution Catalysts at Transition Metal Oxide Photoanodes: Their Differing Roles for Solar Water Splitting

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202003111

Keywords

oxygen evolution catalysts; photoanodes; photoelectrochemistry; solar water splitting

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
  2. EPSRC [EP/S030727/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/S030727/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses efforts to improve water oxidation at photoanodes in the field of photoelectrochemical water splitting, focusing on the use of oxygen evolution catalysts (OECs). The roles of OECs are found to be multifaceted, beyond just catalytic. The review also highlights useful characterization techniques for probing the dynamics of photogenerated holes and proposes design principles for OECs.
In the field of photoelectrochemical water splitting for hydrogen production, dedicated efforts have recently been made to improve water oxidation at photoanodes, and in particular, to accelerate the poor kinetics of the oxygen evolution reaction which is a key step in achieving a viable photocurrent density for industrialization. To this end, coating the photoanode semiconductors with oxygen evolution catalysts (OECs) has been one of the most popular options. The roles of OECs have been found to be multifold, as opposed to exclusively catalytic. This review aims to unravel the complexity of the interfacial processes arising from the material properties of both semiconductors and OECs, and to rationalize the variation in findings in the literature regarding the roles of OECs. Light is also shed on some of the most useful characterization techniques that probe the dynamics of photogenerated holes, to answer some of the field's most challenging mechanistic questions. Finally, some ideas and suggestions on the design principles of OECs are proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available