4.8 Article

How Does External Pressure Shape Li Dendrites in Li Metal Batteries?

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202003416

Keywords

external pressure; Li dendrites; Li metal batteries; mechano-electrochemical properties; phase field model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21825501, U1801257]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFA0202500, 2016YFA0200102]
  3. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

External pressure has a significant impact on the morphology and performance of Li metal batteries, affecting the electroplating reactions and the shape of dendrites. A phase diagram of routine electrolytes under various external pressures has been established, providing rational guidance for designing pressure management systems in batteries.
High-energy density lithium metal batteries have achieved great progress as next-generation rechargeable cells. However, the huge gap in the switching from coin to pouch cells hinders their practical application. External pressure, as one discrepancy between coin and pouch cells, plays an important role in the performance of Li metal anodes. Herein the mechanism for the impact of external pressure on Li dendrites is revealed and quantified by a mechano-electrochemical phase field model. Two influence approaches are outlined as: 1) Inhibiting the progress of electroplating reactions, which lower the rate performance of cells; 2) Shaping the morphology of Li dendrites to be smooth and dense but increasing the mechanical instability. Furthermore, a phase diagram of routine electrolytes (including electrolyte-immersed separators and solid polymer electrolytes) with respect to various external pressures is established, giving rational guidance for designing pressure management systems in working batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available