4.8 Article

Splicing-associated chromatin signatures: a combinatorial and position-dependent role for histone marks in splicing definition

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-20979-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ANR young investigators programs [ANR-16-CE12-001201/CT141033]
  2. EpiGeneSys European Network of Excellence
  3. ARC Foundation
  4. CONICET
  5. Marie Curie framework

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through machine learning analysis, eleven chromatin modifications that differentially mark alternatively spliced exons have been identified. These marks act in a combinatorial and position-dependent way, forming characteristic splicing-associated chromatin signatures. The dynamic nature of chromatin modifications is proposed as a mechanism to rapidly fine-tune alternative splicing when necessary.
Alternative splicing relies on the combinatorial recruitment of splicing regulators to specific RNA binding sites. Chromatin has been shown to impact this recruitment. However, a limited number of histone marks have been studied at a global level. In this work, a machine learning approach, applied to extensive epigenomics datasets in human H1 embryonic stem cells and IMR90 foetal fibroblasts, has identified eleven chromatin modifications that differentially mark alternatively spliced exons depending on the level of exon inclusion. These marks act in a combinatorial and position-dependent way, creating characteristic splicing-associated chromatin signatures (SACS). In support of a functional role for SACS in coordinating splicing regulation, changes in the alternative splicing of SACS-marked exons between ten different cell lines correlate with changes in SACS enrichment levels and recruitment of the splicing regulators predicted by RNA motif search analysis. We propose the dynamic nature of chromatin modifications as a mechanism to rapidly fine-tune alternative splicing when necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available