4.8 Article

Percolation of heterogeneous flows uncovers the bottlenecks of infrastructure networks

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21483-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Public Transport Victoria
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP170102303]
  3. ARC [DP150102472, DP200101119, DP180102551, DP190102134]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infrastructure networks experience fluctuations in flow demand and temporal congestion or overload on flow pathways. By introducing a framework based on flow heterogeneity, bottleneck links with decisive impact on network flow can be identified to enhance network performance.
Whether it be the passengers' mobility demand in transportation systems, or the consumers' energy demand in power grids, the primary purpose of many infrastructure networks is to best serve this flow demand. In reality, the volume of flow demand fluctuates unevenly across complex networks while simultaneously being hindered by some form of congestion or overload. Nevertheless, there is little known about how the heterogeneity of flow demand influences the network flow dynamics under congestion. To explore this, we introduce a percolation-based network analysis framework underpinned by flow heterogeneity. Thereby, we theoretically identify bottleneck links with guaranteed decisive impact on how flows are passed through the network. The effectiveness of the framework is demonstrated on large-scale real transportation networks, where mitigating the congestion on a small fraction of the links identified as bottlenecks results in a significant network improvement. Infrastructure networks are characterized by fluctuations of flow demand between different points and temporal congestion or overload on flow pathways. Hamedmoghadam et al. identify congestion bottlenecks in networks relevant to communication, transportation, water supply, and power distribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available