4.5 Article

Impact of engagement factors on nurses' intention to leave hospital employment

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 1554-1564

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13287

Keywords

chronic fatigue; job satisfaction; nurses; structural equation modelling; turnover intention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified chronic fatigue and meaning/joy in work as significant predictors of hospital nurse turnover intentions. Practices to decrease chronic fatigue and increase meaning/joy in work are recommended to improve nurse retention.
Aim To determine the impact of workforce engagement factors on nurses' intention to leave their hospital. Background Nurse retention is important for safe patient care. It is unknown whether meaning and joy in work, occupational fatigue, job satisfaction and unprofessional behaviour experiences predict hospital nurse turnover intentions. Method This cross-sectional study involved responses from 747 nurses from two south-western hospitals. Measures included surveys to capture meaning and joy in work, job satisfaction, occupational fatigue and unprofessional behaviour exposure/impact. Results Following correlational analyses, manifest variables significantly correlated with related latent factors. In structural equation modelling, greater chronic occupational fatigue was the strongest and meaning and joy at work (negative direction) the next strongest predictor of turnover intention. Although significant, job satisfaction and acute fatigue were weak predictors. Inter-shift recovery did not predict intent to leave. Conclusion This is the first study to identify Chronic Fatigue and meaning and joy in work as significant predictors of hospital nurse turnover intentions. Implications for Nursing Management Employing practices that decrease chronic fatigue and increase meaning/joy in work are recommended to improve nurse retention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available