4.6 Article

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water and sediment from a river basin: sediment-water partitioning, source identification and environmental health risk assessment

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 63-74

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10653-016-9807-3

Keywords

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Partitioning; Source identification; Environmental health; Risk assessment

Funding

  1. National Major Program of Water Pollution Control and Treatment Technology of China [2014ZX07201011]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371495]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The information on concentration levels, partitioning and sources of pollutants in aquatic environment is quite necessary for pollution treatment and quality criteria. In this work, sixteen priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) recommended by U. S. Environmental Protection Agency in the water and sediment of Yinma River Basin were firstly investigated. Among 16 individual PAHs, naphthalene was the highest average concentration in water samples as well as in sediment samples, 67.2 ng/L and 825.06 ng/g, respectively, whereas benzo(g, h, i) perylene was undetected in water samples nor in sediment samples. For three PAH compositional patterns, concentrations of light (23 ring) PAHs were dominant in water and sediment, accounting for 71.69 and 86.98 % respectively. The PAH partitioning in the sedimentwater system was studied, results showed that PAH partitioning was in an unsteady state and tended to accumulate in the sediment. The possible sources of PAHs in water and sediment were both identified as a mixed source of petroleum and combustion. The benzo(a) pyrene equivalents (EBaP) values for PAHs in the water and sediment in some sites were relatively higher, suggesting the existence of environmental health risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available