4.5 Article

Systematics of tardigrada: A reanalysis of tardigrade taxonomy with specific reference to Guil et al. (2019)

Journal

ZOOLOGICA SCRIPTA
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 376-382

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12476

Keywords

phylogenetics; systematics; Tardigrada

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18F18788]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18F18788] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tardigrada is a clade with disputed and complex taxonomy, and a recent molecular study proposed a new classification. Analysis of data under different conditions led to variable conclusions regarding the status of Apotardigrada, cautioning against relying solely on branch length data to determine taxonomic hierarchy.
The Tardigrada are a clade with a disputed and complex taxonomy. The three traditional tardigrade classes are the Heterotardigrada, Eutardigrada and the dubious, monotypic Mesotardigrada. A recent molecular study by Guil et al (Zoologica Scripta, 48, 2019, 120) suggested that the Apochela, previously considered an order of Eutardigrada, should become a new class, Apotardigrada, with the Parachela becoming THE new Eutardigrada. This new diagnosis was presented alongside compelling morphological evidence. Here, we test the assumptions of the molecular evidence for Apotardigrada by analysing tardigrade 18S and 28S data under four separate conditions, along with new BUSCO data, across both Bayesian- and maximum-likelihood phylogenetic approaches. We found variable conclusions regarding the status of Apotardigrada could be drawn by comparing the ribosomal RNA and BUSCO results, and caution against using branch length data to determine taxonomic hierarchy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available