4.7 Article

Analysis on the tool wear behavior of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy under ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting

Journal

WEAR
Volume 466, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2020.203538

Keywords

UEVC; Tool wear; Machinability; Precipitate-free zone; Microstructural evolution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575289]
  2. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talent [BX20190114]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2016EEP03]
  4. Applied Basic Research Program of Qingdao city [19-6-2-69-cg]
  5. Shandong Qingchuang Science and Technology Project [2019KJB022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The machinability and tool wear behavior of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy were compared under different cutting parameters and vibration frequencies in conventional cutting (CC) and ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting (UEVC) processes. Results showed that UEVC required about three fifths the cutting force of CC under the same parameters, with higher cutting surface quality. The cutting surface of UEVC exhibited precipitate-free zones, while tool wear in CC was typically tipping, spalling, adhesive, or oxidative wear, while in UEVC it mainly consisted of impact-induced mechanical wear such as abrasive, mild oxidative, and mild adhesive wear.
The machinability and tool wear behavior of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy versus cutting parameters and vibration frequency are compared between conventional cutting (CC) and ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting (UEVC) processes. A single-factor dry cutting experimental scheme is designed in light of the kinematic property of UEVC. The microstructural evolution in the cutting-layer metal are observed for different cutting parameters and vibration frequencies and the effects of these parameters on the tool wear behavior are investigated for both CC and UEVC. The results indicate that under the same cutting parameters, UEVC requires about three fifths the cutting force required by CC and provides a much higher cutting surface quality than CC. The cutting surface by UEVC shows visible precipitate-free zones (PFZs); the width and intermittent degree of the PFZs are obviously regionalized with vibration frequency, with a critical vibration frequency of 20,000 Hz. For CC, tool wear occurs typically in forms of tipping, spalling wear, or severe adhesive or oxidative wear, whereas for UEVC, tool wear typically mainly consists of impact-induced mechanical wear such as abrasive wear, mild oxidative wear and mild adhesive wear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available