4.3 Article

Fully digital pathology laboratory routine and remote reporting of oral and maxillofacial diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: a validation study

Journal

VIRCHOWS ARCHIV
Volume 479, Issue 3, Pages 585-595

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03075-9

Keywords

Remote reporting; COVID-19; Digital microscopy; Oral and maxillofacial pathology; Digital pathology; Laboratory workflow

Categories

Funding

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES/PROEX, Brazil) [001]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil)
  3. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Brazil) [2009/53839-2]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [09/53839-2] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of digital pathology in remote reporting has been emphasized during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a recent study showing almost perfect agreement between digital and conventional methods in intraobserver comparisons. Despite some disagreements among trainees, digital pathology has the potential to accelerate and streamline laboratory workflows, offering valuable resources for future disruptions like the COVID-19 crisis.
The role of digital pathology in remote reporting has seen an increase during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recently, recommendations had been made regarding the urgent need of reorganizing head and neck cancer diagnostic services to provide a safe work environment for the staff. A total of 162 glass slides from 109 patients over a period of 5 weeks were included in this validation and were assessed by all pathologists in both analyses (digital and conventional) to allow intraobserver comparison. The intraobserver agreement between the digital method (DM) and conventional method (CM) was considered almost perfect (kappa ranged from 0.85 to 0.98, with 95% CI, ranging from 0.81 to 1). The most significant and frequent disagreements within trainees encompassed epithelial dysplasia grading and differentiation among severe dysplasia (carcinoma in situ) and oral squamous cell carcinoma. The most frequent pitfall from DM was lag in screen mirroring. The lack of details of inflammatory cells and the need for a higher magnification to assess dysplasia were pointed in one case each. The COVID-19 crisis has accelerated and consolidated the use of online meeting tools, which would be a valuable resource even in the post-pandemic scenario. Adaptation in laboratory workflow, the advent of digital pathology and remote reporting can mitigate the impact of similar future disruptions to the oral and maxillofacial pathology laboratory workflow avoiding delays in diagnosis and report, to facilitate timely management of head and neck cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available