4.3 Article

FOXO1 gene involvement in a non-rhabdomyosarcomatous neoplasm

Journal

VIRCHOWS ARCHIV
Volume 479, Issue 5, Pages 1031-1036

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03026-4

Keywords

OGT; FOXO1; Myoepithelioma; Rhabdomyosarcoma

Categories

Funding

  1. Universitat Basel (Universitatsbibliothek Basel)
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [320030_189275]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [320030_189275] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Myoepithelial neoplasms of soft tissue are rare tumors with clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and genetic heterogeneity. The diagnosis often requires immunostaining to confirm myoepithelial differentiation. In some cases, tumors may have typical morphology but with immunophenotype that fails to confirm myoepithelial differentiation, termed as myoepithelioma-like tumors.
Myoepithelial neoplasms of soft tissue are rare tumors with clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and genetic heterogeneity. The morphological spectrum of these tumors is broad, and the diagnosis often requires immunostaining to confirm myoepithelial differentiation. Rarely, tumors show a morphology that is typical for myoepithelial neoplasms, while the immunophenotype fails to confirm myoepithelial differentiation. For such lesions, the term myoepithelioma-like tumor was introduced. Recently, two cases of myoepithelioma-like tumors of the hands and one case of the foot were described with previously never reported OGT-FOXO gene fusions. Here, we report a 50-year-old woman, with a myoepithelial-like tumor localized in the soft tissue of the forearm and carrying a OGT-FOXO1 fusion gene. Our findings extend the spectrum of mesenchymal tumors involving members of the FOXO family of transcription factors and point to the existence of a family of soft tissue tumors that carry the gene fusion of the OGT-FOXO family.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available