4.5 Review

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PANORAMIC ULTRASOUND IMAGING FOR EVALUATING MUSCULAR QUALITY AND MORPHOLOGY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 185-200

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.10.009

Keywords

Ultrasound imaging; Panoramic ultrasound; Reliability; Validity; Systematic review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Panoramic ultrasound is a novel method for assessing muscle morphology and quality, showing strong reliability and validity, especially in lower extremities. Further research is needed to confirm its applicability in other locations and clinical/healthy populations.
Panoramic ultrasound (US) is a novel method used to assess linear dimensions, cross-sectional area, fatty infiltrate and echo-intensity features of muscles that cannot be measured with B-mode US. However, a structured overview of its validity and reliability is lacking. MEDLINE, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies evaluating reliability or validity data on panoramic US imaging to determine the muscular morphology and/or quality of skeletal muscles. Most studies had acceptable methodological quality. Seventeen studies analyzing reliability (n = 16) or validity (n = 5) were included. Twelve studies assessed cross-sectional area, seven studies assessed echo-intensity, five assessed linear dimensions (fascicle/tendon length, muscle/subcutaneous adipose thickness or between-structure distance) and one assessed intramuscular fat. Panoramic US seems to be a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of muscle morphology and quality in healthy populations at specific locations, particularly the lower extremities. Studies including scanning procedures are needed to confirm these findings in locations not included in this revision and in both clinical and healthy populations. (E-mail: javaleracalero@gmail.com) (C) 2020 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available