4.7 Review

On the Interpretations of Joint Modeling in Community Ecology

Journal

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 391-401

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.01.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GAMBAS project - Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-18-CE02-0025]
  2. Programme d'Investissement d'Avenir under project FORBIC [18-MPGA-0004]
  3. ERA-Net BiodivERsA -Belmont Forum
  4. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [FutureWeb: ANR18-EBI4-0009]
  5. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1854976]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the mathematical links between species distribution models (SDMs) and joint species distribution models (JSDMs), emphasizing that both models are unable to separate environmental effects from biotic interactions. The authors provide a guide to help determine when JSDMs are preferable to SDMs for species community modeling. Ultimately, the article calls for a better understanding and adoption of novel statistical developments in biodiversity modeling.
Explaining and modeling species communities is more than ever a central goal of ecology. Recently, joint species distribution models (JSDMs), which extend species distribution models (SDMs) by considering correlations among species, have been proposed to improve species community analyses and rare species predictions while potentially inferring species interactions. Here, we illustrate the mathematical links between SDMs and JSDMs and their ecological implications and demonstrate that JSDMs, just like SDMs, cannot separate environmental effects from biotic interactions. We provide a guide to the conditions under which JSDMs are (or are not) preferable to SDMs for species community modeling. More generally, we call for a better uptake and clarification of novel statistical developments in the field of biodiversity modeling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available