4.4 Article

Thickness dependent magnetic properties of ferromagnetic films (Fe, Co) interfaced with Ta

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 719, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2020.138490

Keywords

Magnetic anisotropy; Soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy; X-ray reflectivity; Magnetic dead layer; Magneto-optical Kerr effect; Ion beam sputtering

Funding

  1. UGC-DAE CSR, Indore [CSR-IC-TIMR-04/CRS-271]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the magnetic properties of ferromagnetic films composed of Co and Fe interfaced with Ta using MOKE, XRR, and SXAS. The evolution of magnetic properties with increasing film thickness was studied, showing a thickness-dependent magnetic anisotropy for Co but not for Fe. The coercivity variation with film thickness was in agreement with the observed changes in magnetic anisotropy.
In the present work, magnetic properties of ferromagnetic films viz. Co and Fe interfaced with Ta have been studied using magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE), X-ray reflectivity (XRR) and soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (SXAS) on wedge shaped samples. Thickness of ferromagnetic film at different points of wedge sample as determined from XRR were employed to study the evolution of magnetic properties with increasing film thickness using MOKE measurements. Co film exhibits a uniaxial magnetic anisotropy on Ta which varies as a function of increasing film thickness, while no thickness dependent magnetic anisotropy has been observed for Fe film grown on Ta. The variation of coercivity with increasing film thickness is in agreement with the observed variation of magnetic anisotropy. SXAS measurements qualitatively support alloying / intermixing at interface. Thicknesses of interfacial magnetic dead layer as seen from variation of Kerr intensity with film thickness is relatively higher for Co as compared to Fe, while interfaced with Ta.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available