4.7 Article

Highly accurate and sensitive diagnostic detection of SARS-CoV-2 by digital PCR

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 224, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121726

Keywords

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19); Novel coronavirus (termed SARS-CoV-2); Reverse transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR); Reverse transcription quantitative qPCR (RT-qPCR); Sensitivity

Funding

  1. National Institute of Metrology, P.R. China [31-ZYZJ2001/AKYYJ2009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COVID-19 outbreak caused by a novel Coronavirus has spread globally. Current gold standard RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis shows varying sensitivity, highlighting the need for more accurate methods. A study on RT-dPCR demonstrated significant improvement in detection sensitivity, particularly for asymptomatic patients, making it a highly accurate method for screening suspected cases.
The outbreak of COVID-19 caused by a novel Coronavirus (termed SARS-CoV-2) has spread to over 210 countries around the world. Currently, reverse transcription quantitative qPCR (RT-qPCR) is used as the gold standard for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. However, the sensitivity of RT-qPCR assays of pharyngeal swab samples are reported to vary from 30% to 60%. More accurate and sensitive methods are urgently needed to support the quality assurance of the RT-qPCR or as an alternative diagnostic approach. A reverse transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR) method was established and evaluated. To explore the feasibility of RT-dPCR in diagnostic of SARS-CoV-2, a total of 196 clinical pharyngeal swab samples from 103 suspected patients, 77 close contacts and 16 supposed convalescents were analyzed by RT-qPCR and then measured by the proposed RT-dPCR. For the 103 fever suspected patients, 19 (19/25) negative and 42 (42/49) equivocal tested by RT-qPCR were positive according to RT-dPCR. The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection was significantly improved from 28.2% by RT-qPCR to 87.4% by RT-dPCR. For 29 close contacts (confirmed by additional sample and clinical follow up), 16 (16/17) equivocal and 1 negative tested by RT-qPCR were positive according to RT-dPCR, which is implying that the RT-qPCR is missing a lot of asymptomatic patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of RT-dPCR were 91%, 100% and 93%, respectively. RT-dPCR is highly accurate method and suitable for detection of pharyngeal swab samples from COVID-19 suspected patients and patients under isolation and observation who may not be exhibiting clinical symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available