4.2 Article

Turning Practicing Surgeons Into Health Technology Innovators: Outcomes From the Stanford Biodesign Faculty Fellowship

Journal

SURGICAL INNOVATION
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 134-143

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1553350620984338

Keywords

health technology; medical technology; medtech; innovation; innovation education; biodesign; surgical innovation education

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Established in 2014, the Stanford Biodesign Faculty Fellows program aims to train medical and engineering faculty in a repeatable innovation process for health technology translation while accommodating their busy clinical schedules. Through an eight-month training program, participants are equipped with necessary skills and knowledge to advance technologies towards patient care. Survey results from three years of program participants show that the fellowship effectively improves awareness and experience with skill sets required for health technology innovation and entrepreneurship.
Background. The Stanford Biodesign Faculty Fellows program was established in 2014 to train Stanford Medical and Engineering faculty in a repeatable innovation process for health technology translation while also being compatible with the busy clinical schedules of surgical faculty members. Methods. Since 2014, 62 faculty members have completed the fellowship with 42% (n = 26) coming from 14 surgical subspecialties. This eight-month, needs-based innovation program covers topics from identifying unmet health-related needs, to inventing new technology, developing plans for intellectual property (IP), regulatory, reimbursement, and business models to advance the technologies toward patient care. Results/Conclusion. Intake and exit survey results from three years of program participants (n = 36) indicate that the fellowship is a valuable hands-on educational program capable of improving awareness and experience with skill sets required for health technology innovation and entrepreneurship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available