4.6 Article

Totally laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a single-center case series

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08362-9

Keywords

Synchronous liver metastases; Simultaneous resection; Laparoscopic resection; Stage IV colorectal cancer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In selected patients, totally laparoscopic simultaneous resections of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases are technically feasible, with acceptable morbidity rate and mid-term survival.
BACKGROUND The aim of the study is to analyze the feasibility, the safety and short- and medium-term survival of totally laparoscopic simultaneous resections (LSR) of colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous liver metastases (LM). METHODS This is a retrospective study of a single-center series. Patients ASA IV, ECOG >= 2, major hepatectomies (>= 3 segments), symptomatic CRC as well as low rectal tumors were excluded from indication. The difficulty level of all liver resections was classified as low or intermediate according to the Iwate Criteria. Dindo-Clavien classification for postoperative complications evaluation was used. RESULTS 15 Patients with 21 liver lesions were included. Laparoscopic liver surgery was performed first in every case. Median size of the lesions was 20 mm (r 8-69). Major complications (Dindo-Clavien >= 3) occurred in 3 patients (20%); median hospital stay was 7 days (r 4-35), and only one patient (6.6%) was readmitted upon the first month from the surgery. 90-day mortality rate was 0%. After a median follow-up of 24 months (r 7-121), disease-free survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 58%, 36% and 24%, respectively; overall survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 92.3%. CONCLUSIONS In selected patients, LSR of CRC and LM is technically feasible and has an acceptable morbidity rate and mid-term survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available