4.3 Article

Anatomical resection is useful for the treatment of primary solitary hepatocellular carcinoma with predicted microscopic vessel invasion and/or intrahepatic metastasis

Journal

SURGERY TODAY
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 1429-1439

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02237-1

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Anatomical resection; Microscopic vessel invasion; Microscopic intrahepatic metastasis; Risk factor

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that high des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin concentration, large tumor size, and high aspartate aminotransferase concentration were significant predictors of MVI and/or MIM. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients with zero, one, two, and three risk factors were 97.4%, 73.5%, 71.5%, and 65.5% respectively, with the AR group having superior survival rates in patients with one or two risk factors compared to the non-AR group.
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate anatomical resection (AR) versus non-AR for primary solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with predicted microscopic vessel invasion (MVI) and/or microscopic intrahepatic metastasis (MIM). Methods This retrospective study included 358 patients who underwent hepatectomy and had no evidence of MVI and/or MIM on preoperative imaging. The predictors of MVI and/or MIM were identified. The AR group (n = 222) and the non-AR group (n = 136) were classified by number of risk factor, and the survival rates were compared. Results Microscopic vessel invasion and/or MIM were identified in 81 (22.6%) patients. A multivariate analysis showed that high des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin concentration [odds ratio (OR) 3.35], large tumor size (OR 3.16), and high aspartate aminotransferase concentration (OR 2.13) were significant predictors. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the patients with zero, one, two, and three risk factors were 97.4%, 73.5%, 71.5%, and 65.5%, respectively. The OS of AR is superior to that of non-AR only in patients with one or two risk factors. Conclusion The present findings suggest that AR should be performed for patients with one or two risk factors, and that AR may prevent recurrence, as these patients are at risk of having MVI and/or MIM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available