4.7 Article

Raman spectroscopy and high pressure study of synthetic Ga,Ge-rich tourmaline

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.119171

Keywords

Synthetic tourmaline; Gallium; Germanium; Raman spectroscopy; High pressure; Lattice dynamic calculations

Categories

Funding

  1. Korzhinskii Institute of Experimental Mineralogy RAS [AAAA-A18-118020590140-7, AAAA-A18-118020590150-6]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [1\I 20-77-10065]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Raman spectroscopic analysis of synthetic Ga, Ge-rich tourmalines at pressures up to 30 GPa revealed a correlation between Raman band positions and cation substitutions, as well as a new Ge-O stretching vibration band at around 870 cm(-1). The main Raman bands shifted to higher frequencies with increasing pressure due to structural deformations and decreased bond lengths. Experimental and theoretical data suggested a potential phase transition at approximately 18.4 GPa in tourmalines with up to 10 wt% Ga2O3 and 9 wt% GeO2.
We present Raman spectroscopic analysis of the synthetic Ga,Ge-rich tourmalines at pressures up to 30 GPa for the first time. Based on the experimental data, we obtained correlation between the Raman band positions and the cation substitutions in the tetrahedral and octahedral sites at ambient conditions. A new band of Ge-O stretching vibrations, which is not common in natural tourmalines, occurs at similar to 870 cm(-1). The main Raman bands shift to the higher frequencies with increasing pressure due to decrease in the bond lengths, associated with structural deformations. The lattice dynamic calculated spectra of tourmalines with various compositions resemble those measured experimentally. Analysis of experimental and theoretical data reveals a possible phase transition at similar to 18.4 GPa in the tourmalines with up to 10 wt% Ga2O3 and 9 wt% GeO2. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available