4.0 Review

Esophageal Cancer: An Updated Review

Journal

SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages 161-168

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001226

Keywords

adenocarcinoma of the esophagus; esophageal cancer; squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incidence of esophageal cancer is increasing, with different subtypes like adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma having specific risk factors and regional prevalence. Early detection is crucial due to poor survival rates, and certain patients can benefit from surveillance endoscopies for screening.
The incidence of esophageal cancer (EC) is on the rise. With the distinct subtypes of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma comes specific risk factors, and as a result, people of certain regions of the world can be more prone to a subtype. For example, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus has the highest incidence in eastern Africa and eastern Asia, with smoking being a major risk factor, whereas adenocarcinoma is more prevalent in North America and western Europe, with gastroesophageal reflux disease being a leading risk factor. With that being said, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma have similar and unfortunately poor survival rates, partly because EC is prone to early metastasis given that the esophagus does not have a serosa, as well as the superficial nature of its lymphatics compared with the rest of the gastrointestinal tract. This makes early detection of the utmost importance, and certain patients have been shown to have the benefit of screening/surveillance endoscopies, including those with Barrett's esophagus, lye-induced/caustic strictures, tylosis, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Until treatments significantly improve, identifying EC at the earliest stage will have the best success for patient outcomes, and further elucidation of its pathogenesis and risk factors may lead to identifying other high-risk groups that should be screened.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available