4.1 Article

Batch flowsheet test for a GANEX-type process: the CHALMEX FS-13 process

Journal

SOLVENT EXTRACTION AND ION EXCHANGE
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 189-202

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07366299.2021.1890372

Keywords

GANEX; chalmex; recycling; reprocessing; partitioning

Funding

  1. European Commission GENIORS project [730227]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CHALMEX process focuses on the separate extraction of actinides from spent nuclear fuel solution, aiming to transmute actinides into less radiotoxic elements. By utilizing solvent extraction equilibrium data, a preliminary flowsheet with extraction, scrubbing, and stripping steps was developed to achieve high recovery rates for actinides.
The Chalmers grouped actinide extraction (CHALMEX) process is focused on the co-separation of actinides from all other elements in spent nuclear fuel solution, with the ultimate purpose of transmuting the actinides into shorter-lived and less radiotoxic elements. Based on solvent extraction equilibrium distribution data of actinides and fission products, a preliminary flowsheet was developed and tested in batch mode. The flowsheet consists of one extraction step with the CHALMEX FS-13 solvent (25 mM CyMe4-BTBP in 30% v/v TBP and 70% v/v FS-13), using hydrophilic masking agents (20 mM bimet and 0.2 M mannitol) in the aqueous phase for the complexation of troublesome fission products. Two nitric acid scrub steps (0.5 M HNO3) were efficient in removing co-extracted acid, all molybdenum and the majority of silver. Two stripping stages (0.5 M glycolic acid at pH 4) were efficient in recovery of the actinides from the organic phase. The need for a solvent clean-up stage for the removal of nickel, cadmium, iron and the remaining silver from the organic phase was demonstrated. Based on the distribution data, it was calculated that a 99.9% recovery of americium is possible using only 3 ideal extraction stages, 3 ideal scrubbing stages and 2 ideal stripping stages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available