4.6 Article

Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach

Journal

SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 7169-7180

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-021-05681-w

Keywords

Multi-criteria decision-making; Quality control; Process capability; Process priority number (PPN); Immersion phosphating process

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a method based on AHP and C-p values was developed to identify the significance level of criteria on surface quality in the surface protection processes, focusing on the immersion phosphating process. Important subprocesses affecting the final quality were identified through the developed approach, providing a systematic way to evaluate and improve the quality of surface protection processes.
The surface protection processes are performed for metals in order to improve paint adhesion and dye yield, increase corrosion strength, and eliminate the necessity of re-processing. The desired quality to be received in the parts processed in the surface protection processes which constitutes multiple sub-processes can be obtained only if the sub-processes are conducted effectively. In this study, the criteria being effective on surface protection processes have been identified, and an approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the process capability (C-p) values have been developed in order to identify the significance level of these criteria on the surface quality. The approach developed has been applied to the immersion phosphating process of a large-scale company. First of all, the significant levels of sub-processes were identified through the AHP method based on the quality parameters followed by the company. Then the C-p values were calculated based on the measurement criteria in order to understand the competence of each sub-process. Important subprocesses affecting the final quality of the immersion phosphating process have been identified by means of the PPN (Process Priority Number) index developed by using the AHP results and C-p values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available