4.8 Review

A Review of Compact Carbon Design for Supercapacitors with High Volumetric Performance

Journal

SMALL
Volume 17, Issue 48, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202007548

Keywords

compact carbon; electrodes; supercapacitors; volumetric performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702229, 51525204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Volumetric performance is crucial for energy storage devices in miniaturized electronic devices and space-constrained electric vehicles. Compact carbon design strategies based on key electrode parameters such as density, thickness, gravimetric capacitance, and nonactive components can enhance volumetric performance. Emerging micro-supercapacitors and hybrid supercapacitors face opportunities and challenges in trendy Internet of things applications or larger device systems.
Volumetric performance is of great importance in today's energy storage devices, and is used to evaluate their competitiveness in the markets of miniaturized electronic devices and space-constrained electric vehicles. Supercapacitors suffer from a low volumetric energy density in spite of their high power and long cycle life because of their use of porous but low-density carbons. This review considers compact carbon design strategies for high volumetric performance supercapacitors based on four key electrode parameters: density, thickness, gravimetric capacitance, and nonactive components. A guide is provided for constructing a conductive additive-/binder-free self-supported ultrathick, dense electrode to maximize the volumetric energy density. The research status of emerging micro-supercapacitors and hybrid supercapacitors is then briefly discussed, emphasizing the importance of their volumetric performance and the opportunities as well as challenges they face in the trendy Internet of things applications or larger device systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available