4.7 Article

The influence of different ZnO nanostructures on NO2 sensing performance

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 329, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129145

Keywords

NO2 sensor; Morphology-dependent; ZnO; UV; Room temperature

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61871198, 61474057, 61520106003]
  2. National key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0201002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three different ZnO nanostructures (nanorods/flowers/spheres) were prepared using hydrothermal method or water bath, and their sensing properties to NO2 activated by UV light were investigated. The nanospheres showed the highest response due to their largest specific surface area, while the nanorods exhibited the fastest response and recovery speeds. The nanoflowers performed in between the nanorods and nanospheres in terms of gas-sensing response and response speed.
Three different ZnO nanostructures (nanorods/flowers/spheres) were prepared through facile hydrothermal method or water bath, whose sensing properties to NO2 were investigated in detail at room temperature activated by UV light (365 nm LED). The sensing results showed that ZnO nanospheres exhibit the highest response of 29.4-5 ppm NO2, which can be attributed to their biggest specific surface area and the most amount of adsorbed oxygen species on the surface. In contrast, ZnO nanorods show the fastest response and recovery speed (9 and 18 s to 5 ppm NO2, respectively) due to their highest crystallinity, least surface defects and unidirectional electron transfer path, which is much faster than most reported literatures. With regard to the ZnO nanoflowers, both the gas-sensing response and the response and recovery speed are between ZnO nanorods and ZnO nanospheres. Furthermore, the stability, selectivity, and the moisture resistance of three different ZnO nanostructures were also researched.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available