4.6 Article

Electrochemical Genosensing of E. coli Based on Padlock Probes and Rolling Circle Amplification

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21051749

Keywords

isothermal amplification; rolling circle amplification; padlock probes; electrochemical genosensing; magnetic particles

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), Madrid [BIO2016-75751-R]
  2. Ministry of Science and Innovation [PID2019-106625RB-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilizes isothermal amplification techniques for the detection of E. coli based on DNA, with preconcentration and amplification on magnetic particles. It shows improved analytical performance and eliminates the need for bulky equipment.
Isothermal amplification techniques are emerging nowadays for the rapid and accurate detection of pathogenic bacteria in low resource settings, where many infectious diseases are endemic, and the lack of reliable power supply, trained personnel and specialized facilities pose critical barriers for timely diagnosis. This work addresses the detection of E. coli based on DNA isothermal amplification performed on magnetic particles (MPs) followed by electrochemical genosensing on disposable electrodes by square-wave voltammetry. In this approach, the bacterial DNA is preconcentrated using a target-specific magnetic probe and then amplified on the MPs by rolling circle amplification (RCA). Two different electrochemical readout methods for the RCA amplicons are tested. The first one relied on the labelling of the magnetic RCA product with a digoxigenin probe followed by the incubation with antiDIG-HRP antibody as electrochemical reporter. In the second case, the direct detection with an HRP-probe was performed. This latter strategy showed an improved analytical performance, while simultaneously avoiding the use of thermocyclers or bulky bench top equipment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available