4.6 Article

Remaining Useful Life (RUL) Prediction of Equipment in Production Lines Using Artificial Neural Networks

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21030932

Keywords

machine learning; production lines; predictive maintenance; data mining; maintenance prediction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a novel machine learning-based approach for automating the prediction of equipment failures in continuous production lines. The proposed model utilizes various techniques to preprocess data and employs neural network algorithm, demonstrating effectiveness in predicting the remaining useful life of turbo engines in a case study using NASA turbo engine datasets.
Predictive maintenance of production lines is important to early detect possible defects and thus identify and apply the required maintenance activities to avoid possible breakdowns. An important concern in predictive maintenance is the prediction of remaining useful life (RUL), which is an estimate of the number of remaining years that a component in a production line is estimated to be able to function in accordance with its intended purpose before warranting replacement. In this study, we propose a novel machine learning-based approach for automating the prediction of the failure of equipment in continuous production lines. The proposed model applies normalization and principle component analysis during the pre-processing stage, utilizes interpolation, uses grid search for parameter optimization, and is built with multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP) machine learning algorithm. We have evaluated the approach using a case study research to predict the RUL of engines on NASA turbo engine datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that the performance of our proposed model is effective in predicting the RUL of turbo engines and likewise substantially enhances predictive maintenance results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available