4.6 Article

Automated Segmentation of Infarct Lesions in T1-Weighted MRI Scans Using Variational Mode Decomposition and Deep Learning

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21061952

Keywords

brain infarction; stroke; U-Net; variational mode decomposition

Funding

  1. King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang Research Fund [2563-02-01-007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an automated method for segmenting infarct lesions of the brain, which combines variational mode decomposition and deep learning-based segmentation to achieve excellent results. The method includes variational mode decomposition as preprocessing, overlapped patches strategy to reduce workload, and using a three-dimensional U-Net model for patch-wise segmentation.
Automated segmentation methods are critical for early detection, prompt actions, and immediate treatments in reducing disability and death risks of brain infarction. This paper aims to develop a fully automated method to segment the infarct lesions from T1-weighted brain scans. As a key novelty, the proposed method combines variational mode decomposition and deep learning-based segmentation to take advantages of both methods and provide better results. There are three main technical contributions in this paper. First, variational mode decomposition is applied as a pre-processing to discriminate the infarct lesions from unwanted non-infarct tissues. Second, overlapped patches strategy is proposed to reduce the workload of the deep-learning-based segmentation task. Finally, a three-dimensional U-Net model is developed to perform patch-wise segmentation of infarct lesions. A total of 239 brain scans from a public dataset is utilized to develop and evaluate the proposed method. Empirical results reveal that the proposed automated segmentation can provide promising performances with an average dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.6684, intersection over union (IoU) of 0.5022, and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) of 0.3932, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available