4.6 Review

Head-Mounted Display-Based Therapies for Adults Post-Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21041111

Keywords

head-mounted display; immersive virtual reality; motor recovery; rehabilitation; stroke

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport of the Government of Spain [PRX16/00365]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immersion virtual reality techniques show some effectiveness in the rehabilitation of stroke patients, serving as a non-pharmacological therapeutic pathway when used in conjunction with traditional rehabilitation therapies, although evidence is limited.
Immersive virtual reality techniques have been applied to the rehabilitation of patients after stroke, but evidence of its clinical effectiveness is scarce. The present review aims to find studies that evaluate the effects of immersive virtual reality (VR) therapies intended for motor function rehabilitation compared to conventional rehabilitation in people after stroke and make recommendations for future studies. Data from different databases were searched from inception until October 2020. Studies that investigated the effects of immersive VR interventions on post-stroke adult subjects via a head-mounted display (HMD) were included. These studies included a control group that received conventional therapy or another non-immersive VR intervention. The studies reported statistical data for the groups involved in at least the posttest as well as relevant outcomes measuring functional or motor recovery of either lower or upper limbs. Most of the studies found significant improvements in some outcomes after the intervention in favor of the virtual rehabilitation group. Although evidence is limited, immersive VR therapies constitute an interesting tool to improve motor learning when used in conjunction with traditional rehabilitation therapies, providing a non-pharmacological therapeutic pathway for people after stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available