4.1 Article

Hereditary Myelopathies

Journal

SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 303-308

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725153

Keywords

hereditary myelopathy; hereditary myelopathy; neurogenetic disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hereditary myelopathies are an important and often underestimated component of neurogenetic diseases. Advances in neuroimaging and sequencing technologies have expanded classical phenotypes and challenged previous assumptions about age of onset and survival. Atypical presentations are increasingly being recognized, leading to a better understanding of the genetic basis of myelopathy and considerations for genetic testing.
Hereditary myelopathies are an important and likely underappreciated component of neurogenetic disease. While previously distinctions have been made by age of onset, the growing power and availability of high-quality neuroimaging and next-generation sequencing are increasingly expanding classical phenotypes and diminishing the utility of age-based classifications. Increasingly, cases of atypical disease presentations are challenging past assumptions regarding the age of onset and survival in many disorders and identifying allelic syndromes in others. Despite this, there is poor awareness of the potential for spinal involvement in many diseases that typically affect the brain. Broadly speaking, congenital myelopathies can be neuroanatomically grouped into motor neuron, axonopathy, spinocerebellar, cerebroleukodystrophy, and pan-neuraxis (generally central nervous system predominant with associated axonopathy) disorders. Here, we review hereditary causes of myelopathy, organized by neuroanatomy, and highlight atypical presentations. We discuss findings concerning an underlying genetic etiology for myelopathy, as well as practical, technical, and ethical considerations of diagnostic genetic testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available