4.4 Article

The effects of sprifermin on symptoms and structure in a subgroup at risk of progression in the FORWARD knee osteoarthritis trial

Journal

SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 450-456

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.03.005

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Treatment

Categories

Funding

  1. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
  2. EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc
  3. an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed pain outcomes and cartilage thickness change in knee osteoarthritis patients at risk of further progression treated with sprifermin. The subgroup at risk showed faster disease progression and maintained net benefit on total cartilage thickness during treatment.
Objective: To assess pain outcomes and cartilage thickness change in a subgroup at risk (SAR) of further progression in the FORWARD trial of knee osteoarthritis patients treated with sprifermin. Methods: Patients were randomised 1:1:1:1:1 to: sprifermin 100 mu g every 6 months (q6mo), 100 mu g q12mo, 30 mu g q6mo, 30 mu g q12mo, or placebo for 18 months. SAR was defined as baseline medial or lateral minimum joint-space width (mJSW) 1.5-3.5 mm and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score 40-90 units. Follow-up to 3 years was included in the analysis. Treatment benefit was explored by repeated measures, linear dose-effect trends by timepoint. Results: The SAR comprised 161 (29%) of 549 patients. Mean difference (95% CI) in WOMAC pain at year 3 for sprifermin 100 mu g q6mo vs placebo SAR was -8.75 (-22.42, 4.92) for SAR vs 0.97 (-6.22, 8.16) for the intentto-treat population. SAR placebo patients lost more cartilage over 2 years than the modified ITT (mITT) placebo arm (mean change from baseline, mm [SD]: -0.05 [0.10] vs -0.02 [0.07]). Net total femorotibial joint thickness gain with sprifermin 100 mu g q6mo (adjusted mean difference from placebo [95% CI] was similar in the SAR and in the mITT group: 0.06 [0.01, 0.11] vs 0.05 [0.03, 0.07]). Conclusions: Selection for low mJSW and moderate-to-high pain at baseline resulted in more rapid disease progression and demonstrated translation of structure modification (with maintained net benefit on total cartilage thickness) into symptomatic benefit. This subgroup may represent a target population for future trials. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available